Monday, 26 November 2012

UK Midwife On Trial For Causing Death In “Backstreet Circumcision”


A Manchester midwife has gone on trial for the ‘manslaughter by gross negligence’ of a four-week-old boy who bled to death after she performed a ‘backstreet circumcision’ in his home.

The case reminds us that doing nothing about the issue of unnecessary male circumcision in the UK is no longer an option.

It is alleged that Mrs Grace Adeleye carried out the procedure with no anaesthetic or local pain relief and left a "ragged" wound which caused the baby to bleed to death in April 2010.

Unlike girls in the UK, boys have no legal protection against adults who want to perform medically unnecessary surgery on their genitals without anaesthetic in backstreet settings such as homes, restaurants and community centres.

The midwife in this case is not charged with performing the act, but performing the act in a negligent way

In an similar case earlier this year, a baby boy bled to death after Rabbi Mordehai Cohen, who performed a ‘backstreet circumcision’ at a home in Queens Park, London, advised his concerned mother to stem the bleeding from the wound with Vaseline (petroleum jelly), but he was not considered to have been negligent.

In a case in Bristol, a baby boy's skull was fractured during a ritual circumcision performed on a kitchen table but no-one was ever held to account for the injury.

Everyday, as many as 100 Unnecessary Male Circumcisions are performed in the UK, a practice which can cause death, disability, disease, pain and discomfort and physical damage.

Complications are common, two boys a week are being admitted to the Emergency Department in Birmingham Children’s Hospital and one boy a month comes close to death as a result of male circumcision.

In Oxford, a survey revealed that 45% of ‘backstreet circumcisions’ performed at an Islamic school led to complications

In Manchester, up to three boys every month to the Royal Manchester Children's Hospital because of bleeding after 'backstreet circumcisions' performed in people’s homes.

In the Manchester case reported on the BBC websitefour-week old Goodluck Caubergs died the day after nurse Grace Adeleye carried out the procedure without anaesthetic, Manchester Crown Court was told.

The jury heard the 66-year-old only used scissors, forceps and olive oil at an address in Chadderton, Greater Manchester in April 2010.

Mrs Adeleye denies manslaughter by gross negligence.
The court heard the medic and Goodluck's parents are originally from Nigeria, where the circumcision of newborns is the tradition for Christian families.

Mrs Adeleye, of Sarnia Court, Salford, was paid £100 to do the operation as Goodluck's parents did not know the procedure was available on the NHS.

It is alleged the defendant, who is also a midwife, left a "ragged" wound that bled and her post-operative care was inadequate.
The family home, where the procedure took place, is a mile and a half from Royal Oldham Hospital.

Adrian Darbishire QC, opening the case for the prosecution, told the jury: "The allegation essentially here is that the care she provided in the course of that procedure was so bad that not only did it cause the death of that young baby wholly unnecessarily, but it amounted to gross negligence and a crime."

The court heard that up to three children a month are admitted to the Royal Manchester Children's Hospital because of bleeding after home-based circumcisions - a danger the nurse should have been aware of.

Mrs Adeleye went to Goodluck's home on 16 April 2010, telling his mother to fetch some olive oil and a bowl of warm water and stripping the baby to his vest, the jury was told.

The defendant brought her "instruments" out of her handbag and dipped a pair of scissors into the water in a kidney dish.

She carried out the procedure with no anaesthetic or local pain relief before cleaning the wound with cotton wool and applied a bandage, the court heard.

Between 30 and 40 minutes after surgery, Mrs Adeleye left without making any proper checks on the patient, Mr Darbishire said.

Later, the parents found the bandage had come off the wound, which dripped with blood and there was blood in Goodluck's nappy.

Mr Darbishire said even a small amount of blood loss is dangerous and the loss of just one sixth of a pint of blood can be fatal for a newborn.

A post-mortem examination revealed Goodluck's death was caused by a loss of blood.

The trial continues.

6 comments:

  1. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AFe68SeoCQQ

    ReplyDelete
  2. " UNICEF explains:

    Human rights apply to all age groups; children have the same general human rights as adults. But children are particularly vulnerable and so they also have particular rights that recognize their special need for protection.10 " http://www.doctorsopposingcircumcision.org/DOC/statement09.html

    ReplyDelete
  3. People, another boy has died.

    He died a martyr to the obsessive belief that nature's design for the tip of the penis is badly mistaken (see Szasz quote). This is a murder that resulted from what was in effect a perverted and violent sexual act. Janine Parvati Baker (1949-2005) was indeed right when she said that circumcision was where sex and violence first meet.

    I am overcome with nausea.

    ReplyDelete
  4. "Janine Parvati Baker (1949-2005) was indeed right when she said that circumcision was where sex and violence first meet."

    Now this is worth repeating and repeating. Society believes male sexuality is violent, so it's no wonder boys are treated this way. Weird living in a society that calls itself "civilized", when in actuality, we are stuck well in the dark-ages still.
    Glen, I don't live far from you, and hope to meet you someday soon. I want to do all I can.

    ReplyDelete
  5. You can practice the rituals of any mythology that takes your fancy, or be an atheist. But if these rituals take the form of mutilation of children, then they are immoral and unethical, and the State should have every right to make them illegal.
    Children must not be made to suffer because of the religion of their parents, and that is why the genital mutilation of anyone below the age of majority must be made illegal.

    ReplyDelete
  6. A report in 2006 by the British Medical Association detailed this problem, stating: “The medical benefits previously claimed, however, have not been convincingly proven, and it is now widely accepted, including by the BMA, that this surgical procedure has medical and psychological risks.” http://mancunianmatters.co.uk/content/30018255-every-adult%E2%80%99s-responsibility-campaign-calls-circumcision-regulation-following-tragi

    ReplyDelete